As property managers, one of our responsibilities is marketing. How do we get out message out to potential prospects, what do we say to entice them to call or visit us, and what mediums do we use? These are all points we have to consider, however, one critical point is often overlooked...understanding who we are marketing to.
Before you can decide on a medium, enticement line, or any other consideration we have to understand who our residents are and who our prospects are. Analysis of our target market is more than just price point, and for any community we have to consider a host of variables. These include:
1. Yes price is a factor, therefore who can afford our apartments? If our guideline is normally three times rent to income, what does that equate to? As an example for an $800 per month rent that comes to a base income of $28,800 or someone that makes approximately $14.00 per hour (if you look at a 40 hour work week that equates to 2,080 hours per year). If your guideline is higher or rents are higher, you can do the math to find out who you should target based on price. The first question is what jobs pay that would meet your minimum income standards?
2. Where do people work and what is the average travel time in your market? Are there geographic or topographic considerations such as rivers, mountains, or even toll roads that people look at in getting to primary work areas? While you have three different market areas within any major market (primary, secondary, and tertiary), how do trends within the market related to these considerations as well as public transportation play a part? A downtown mid-rise compared to a rural three story walk-up community will look at marketing very different just based on what I call "behavioral" patterns of living.
3. Is there an primary age range that seems to fit your community better or a range that has already been identified as through years of establishment? Do you cater to an older clientele based on the location or seasonal nature of the market (here in Florida we have many senior communities)? Is your community designed and built with more "new age" design and amenities where you might target a younger and more professional resident?
4. What amenities, resident activities, appointments or other considerations that identify with any market segment which can help attract prospects to your community? This also includes anything from stainless appliances to floor covering, garages, and other features as well as square footage and storage space.
Next you need to complete an analysis on what marketing mediums you have available, what your budget is, and how you can get your message to potential prospects. Is your target more "technology" savoy and you need to focus on electronic mediums more than print? Maybe your target is "seasoned citizens," who based on generational studies still want a guide they can hold in their hand. Maybe you need to have a combination of mediums to attract the highest number of qualified candidates and maintain maximum occupancy. So many choices and decisions, and a limited amount of funds in my budget. So now what do I do?
This is where analysis of the mediums comes into play. Once you have identified who you need to get your message to, how do I do it? If there are three print publications in my market, which one is the best choice? First, never assume the one you have always used is the best choice for your community. I have had managers tell me the issue with occupancy is the market, when in fact it was the "marketing" that was the problem. Remember, with all the mediums and communities...your prospects have choices! Any one of the publications will tell you why they are the best. Any one of the internet sites will show you graphs and charts as to why they are the best. I have never heard a sales rep say, "You know what, I think you will do better with the Apartment Factor rather than our publication." Ain't going to happen. You also must understand markets and conditions will change, just as what each of the medium suppliers has will change compared to the competition. We live and work in a field that is constantly evolving, therefore our marketing needs to be evaluated constantly to make sure we are spending our money wisely and productively. For example when choosing a print publication the following should be part of your analysis:
1. What is the distribution and how often is the publication updated? Are their distribution racks at locations that "hit" your target market? I once had a print representative tell me they had "x" number of print racks in the city. Problem was they were not at productive or easily viewed locations, not in markets that were within the target market, and I could only change the publication information in my ad quarterly versus monthly. She showed me how thick her book was, however, when calling other competitors and looking at our stats they were not the first rated medium.
2. What backup marketing such as internet resources come with the print, and are they productive. Yes I need to be in a print publication, but my clientele also are "techno savoy." Therefore I need a publication that is strong with hitting my target market with the publication, but also need to see them at the top of the search when I Google, "Apartments Orlando," as an example. Try it and see where your internet marketing provider comes up?
3. How "eye friendly" is the publication. Is there a place for a map? How much bullet point space do I have? Is it easy to find by sections of the city? How user friendly is it including size and ease of use?
Last point is related to the financial part. Since I have pages more in my head but limited space, I'll get into "internet" marketing in another piece. That will take up an expanded posting just with the changes that are happening with that medium. So, back to financial! So I have limited funds, where do I go. If you are confident your leasing staff is doing their job, review the stats for where your traffic is coming from. Next, review your ad and content to insure you are confident you are getting your "target message" across. If you are in two publications, which one produces more and why? Call your comps and ask them how many leases on average do they get from XYZ Publication? I like using leases versus traffic because that's what it all boils down to. If I get 50 visitors a month from a publication but only 10 were qualified, something is wrong. It's not traffic I want in the door, it's what I call "leaseable" traffic. Leases are the only thing that puts money in the bank.
Final point is not being afraid to ask your owner or upper management for funds to expand your marketing as long as everything else is in check (message, medium, leasing team, etc.). I know, they will say it's not in the budget. Neither is lower income from lower occupancy so look at it this way. I have a saying and that is, "hit them in the wallet and their hearts and minds will follow." Basically you have to "sell" what you want, not just ask for what you want. Mrs. Owner, if I could increase income by $4,000 per month (5 leases at an average of $800 per apartment) while only having an $800 a month expense offset, would you consider it? Now you have their attention. Show them your complete analysis, how you got to the numbers you did, the study you made, and the expected result based on your analysis, and they will find it hard not to approve the expense.
Until next time when we'll hit our "technology" side of marketing. Make it a great week and lease-em-up!
You can find "Complex - A Guide To Apartment Management," and "Leadership - Finding the leader in you," and my novels available on Kindle at Amazon.com, or you can email at lawrenceberry@verizon.net. I have a passion for training, coaching, and education. Most of what I write can be related to any industry. Leadership, communications, training and education, marketing, and hiring. The majority of my career has been managing property, but more importantly leading others to excel and exceed.
Cabellas
Saturday, August 20, 2011
Friday, August 12, 2011
Checks and Balances
Now most people would think this talks about accounting or your checkbook. Others might think it has to do with keeping a balance on life or what you do professionally. As property managers we work with finances and deal with many areas. Sometimes we focus on the balance sheet or financial report and are slow to make changes, not really understanding or analyzing things like how some of the numbers impact the bottom line. When we see occupancy income, concessions, and in particular bad debt, what does it mean other than just a set of numbers? It can mean the difference between cash flowing and meeting goals or not.
Tied to these financial areas are two important aspects including the applicant checks and the handling of unpaid balances. We have many options when it comes to resident screening, most accessing the same information to provide your data. We also need to take into consideration there is a delay between when negative information is provided to the credit agencies and when it will show up on an account, which includes late payments, judgments, evictions, etc. Approval, conditional, and denial parameters can be set with any of the software programs, which provide guidance in reaching your decisions. One of the most useful technology changes we have had over the years is having these systems, which takes subjectivity out of the approval process. In the past we received a credit report from one of the reporting agencies (Equifax, Experian, TransUnion), looked at the data, and made decisions with many variables to consider. Today the variables can be programmed in, providing for a better handling of Fair Housing issues as well as a way to set and track scoring as markets and the economy changes. In addition to Fair Housing and the data tracking, many other tools such as "what if" scenarios are available...but seldom used. A recent conversation with a property manager brought up the first part of this topic, the "checks" aspect. She said her corporate office set all the guidelines and "what if" or other database information was not reviewed with her regional or anyone from corporate. She basically said, "I've been told it wasn't my job!" My response to her was, if no one else is offering why don't you ask to review and provide input. She indicated they were recently seeing more conditional and denial responses, her occupancy was being challenged, and she basically felt the blame was on her. Not the first time I have heard this coming from a site manager, and probably won't be the last. She had called me as she felt her position was in jeopardy, and since I was no longer her regional (which we used to review and revise based on her recommendations when we worked together) this aspect of oversight had been taken out of her hands but not the responsibility. So let me understand this correctly, we want to hold them accountable but not give them the responsibility that goes along with it! I politely told her to approach her regional and if she did not get anywhere...she might want to give her resume a review. The ease with access of this information so you can monitor and evaluate (being pro-active versus re-active), the rapid ability to make changes because of technology, and the ability to use the tools available are what makes these systems so great. The other thing I hear managers say is they may review quarterly and make adjustments, even though market conditions as we all know can change weekly. Unfortunately in our changing environments and quickly changing economic conditions, by the time you make the changes it is too late. What we would have given for these tools to be available even fifteen years ago, and to see them not being used to their fullest is shameful.
The other part of this is the "balances" aspect. We all know the job market is let's say "challenging," and this is not to mention with higher gas and other expenses the trend seems to be witnessing higher evictions and collection issues. The days of "promise to pay," or payment plans I believe have ended. Once someone is in financial distress, looses their job, or simply does not budget and manage their finances well, the handwriting seems to be on the wall. Four areas of prompt response and action are critical to minimizing bad debt, however, we appear to have conditioned our management teams to stay with the old standard ways of handling.
1. Review the application and credit report for credit card data. Managers may ask a resident who is late when they can pay (with promises that many times go unfulfilled), and of course send the "legal" notifications as required by state statute and company policy. Those legal notifications and policies should continue, however, in this day and age we need to look outside of the box and maybe look at the credit information. "Mr. Smith. As you may be aware to handle this from an equable position as well as from a legal standpoint, we do not have any options other than what is being done. We often find residents have options they have not thought of and that would be to use credit card resources in challenging times to bridge their situation. In reviewing your file, we see you have open credit card lines which may be able to assist you in avoiding necessary legal action." Also asking if they have relatives or anyone that can assist them is not out of line. This also many times diffuses some of the tensions as landlords (those evil people), and lets them know we are also looking at all solutions and not just the legal solution.
2. Process all necessary notices and file or submit for legal action consistently in the shortest time possible. Waiting a few extra days sets precedents, which also can have legal ramifications, and sends a message to other residents that it may be ok to not pay your rent on time. This delay can also raise Fair Housing issues, which you do not want to deal with. Being selective on who you file on because "Mrs. Smith is always late but she eventually pays," can also bring about litigious concerns as well as fiduciary ones as representatives of an owner. Collecting money is part of what we do as property managers, and while it is not the most fun thing to do it is our job. Don't like it...find another profession. It is also a proven fact the sooner you turn or begin collection efforts, the better you have a chance of collection.
3. One of the frustrations I hear from managers is by the time a judgment is posted through the court system to the credit agencies, the non-paying resident has already found a new apartment. The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act does not state you cannot turn over money owed to a collection company before you get a judgement, which can in turn report the amount owed to the credit reporting agencies. Make sure your documentation including lease allows this, as well as any state statutes are not preventing you from moving forward with legal action and allow for this type of action. Just be reminded, if you turn over to a collection agency you will owe them a fee if they collect.
4. Don't be afraid to ask for the apartment back if they say they have no options and will not be able to pay. Give them the benefits, which do not negate your ability to seek the money through collection efforts. You may find several benefits here. (1) You mitigate the bad debt on your financial. (2) You can get the apartment back to turn and get ready for a "paying" resident. (3) You avoid legal and court costs which in many cases you cannot recapture.
Many managers I find do not look at the options they have and how to handle outside of the ways things have always been done. I urge leadership to give them responsibility, encourage out-of-the-box thinking, and work smarter and not necessarily harder when it comes to financial and other management/leadership issues.
Thursday, August 4, 2011
Fair Housing
One very important aspect of our responsibilities as property managers is compliance with fair housing. Having attended many educational events related to the topic, I find it interesting as to how this subject is usually taught. For some reason instructors and course leaders teach by what I call "intimidation" rather than through education. Almost all of the teachings are telling our teams what we want them to avoid, rather than teaching them what we want them to do. I relate this to a simple example which I believe is relevant. If our property personnel are concentrating on the negative and constantly looking over their back, will their efficacy be diminished in reaching goals and objectives in front of them? I believe the answer is yes.
I have also found in my studies and teachings that over 80% of our teams cannot tell you what the seven protected classes are, and this includes upper management. If executives and upper management don't know, how can they effectively lead others in any area so important. How many of you can state without beating your head against the wall or guessing, what the classes are? I rest my case! If our team members don't know the classes, they cannot fully practice fair housing and therefore increase the chances of a violation. Again, can't hit a target if they can't see it...or don't recognize it as a target!
By presenting what we want our people to do rather than what we want them to avoid, we serve the same purpose while keeping them focused on the target in front of them. We tell them how lawsuits, fines, HUD and other pitfalls can expose them and their organization, and focus on what ramifications are if they are in violation. Basically we "scare" them into what they need to avoid from a fair housing standpoint not what they should be doing, again keeping them looking over their shoulder rather than forward. While violation action can be scary, I believe there is a very different way of presenting this topic.
1. Give them examples they can relate to when it comes to fair housing. Professional trainers know if you can provide relative information and present it in a manner people can relate to, they will retain it. The term used is cognitive recognition where our minds understand something because it provides a conscious awareness of it.
2. Instead of an annual refresher, condition your team of protected classes with subliminal reminders. This might include simple reminders at the bottom of emails above your address information. It also includes occasionally asking at site visits of ALL personnel on a site the classes are. Almost 96% of my research shows service has no clue what they are either, even higher than our office staff.
3. Be gentle in reminding some of the pitfalls, and don't use intimidation as a training tactic. As an example asking a leasing person how something could be perceived if I offer refreshments to one person and not another. Remember, most fair housing complaints are based on "perceived" treatment making it more subjective than objective.
4. Ask for their experiences of how they feel they may not have been treated fairly. This could be related to job, shopping, customer service, or other areas. Their experiences and feedback again provide relevance to that perception factor in fair housing. Remind them also that treating others "fairly" is only part of the picture, as the word "equal" is also part of what we do. Sometimes people try to distinguish between the two, with either one of them being considered in fair housing. We cannot assume corporate knows Fair Housing either. Many CEO's, CFO's, and COO's have never run a community or even been in a position of regional manager or VP. This is especially true of those working on our web sites and someone that might be in the position of CIO (Chief Information Officer). Very recently I was looking at a position with a company as their regional manager and doing my homework as I always do. At one of their property sites they had listed the application fee was, "$25 for single and $50 for married couples." Does anyone other than myself see how this is a direct violation of familiar status? I found another site while doing some consulting work for another company where they stated, "we do not allow pets so don't ask." Not only was this a very unprofessional way of saying something, it also could turn away someone with a service animal where they may think this could be construed as discriminatory.
Fair housing is basic and not complicated. Treat everyone with "respect," "dignity," and "kindness," and you will be in compliance. We all have the right to be treated fairly and everyone wants to be treated equally. Give them a target they can understand and see, and they will hit it.
http://gan.doubleclick.net/gan_click?lid=41000000031855266&pubid=21000000000389926
I have also found in my studies and teachings that over 80% of our teams cannot tell you what the seven protected classes are, and this includes upper management. If executives and upper management don't know, how can they effectively lead others in any area so important. How many of you can state without beating your head against the wall or guessing, what the classes are? I rest my case! If our team members don't know the classes, they cannot fully practice fair housing and therefore increase the chances of a violation. Again, can't hit a target if they can't see it...or don't recognize it as a target!
By presenting what we want our people to do rather than what we want them to avoid, we serve the same purpose while keeping them focused on the target in front of them. We tell them how lawsuits, fines, HUD and other pitfalls can expose them and their organization, and focus on what ramifications are if they are in violation. Basically we "scare" them into what they need to avoid from a fair housing standpoint not what they should be doing, again keeping them looking over their shoulder rather than forward. While violation action can be scary, I believe there is a very different way of presenting this topic.
1. Give them examples they can relate to when it comes to fair housing. Professional trainers know if you can provide relative information and present it in a manner people can relate to, they will retain it. The term used is cognitive recognition where our minds understand something because it provides a conscious awareness of it.
2. Instead of an annual refresher, condition your team of protected classes with subliminal reminders. This might include simple reminders at the bottom of emails above your address information. It also includes occasionally asking at site visits of ALL personnel on a site the classes are. Almost 96% of my research shows service has no clue what they are either, even higher than our office staff.
3. Be gentle in reminding some of the pitfalls, and don't use intimidation as a training tactic. As an example asking a leasing person how something could be perceived if I offer refreshments to one person and not another. Remember, most fair housing complaints are based on "perceived" treatment making it more subjective than objective.
4. Ask for their experiences of how they feel they may not have been treated fairly. This could be related to job, shopping, customer service, or other areas. Their experiences and feedback again provide relevance to that perception factor in fair housing. Remind them also that treating others "fairly" is only part of the picture, as the word "equal" is also part of what we do. Sometimes people try to distinguish between the two, with either one of them being considered in fair housing. We cannot assume corporate knows Fair Housing either. Many CEO's, CFO's, and COO's have never run a community or even been in a position of regional manager or VP. This is especially true of those working on our web sites and someone that might be in the position of CIO (Chief Information Officer). Very recently I was looking at a position with a company as their regional manager and doing my homework as I always do. At one of their property sites they had listed the application fee was, "$25 for single and $50 for married couples." Does anyone other than myself see how this is a direct violation of familiar status? I found another site while doing some consulting work for another company where they stated, "we do not allow pets so don't ask." Not only was this a very unprofessional way of saying something, it also could turn away someone with a service animal where they may think this could be construed as discriminatory.
Fair housing is basic and not complicated. Treat everyone with "respect," "dignity," and "kindness," and you will be in compliance. We all have the right to be treated fairly and everyone wants to be treated equally. Give them a target they can understand and see, and they will hit it.
http://gan.doubleclick.net/gan_click?lid=41000000031855266&pubid=21000000000389926
Wednesday, August 3, 2011
It's about people
In this age of technology we expect everything right now and it to be error free. Other expectations include communications to be immediate, everyone to be understanding, have cognition of others emotions and feelings, and Lord forbid don't forget to respond to my Facebook posting or tweet. We have transitioned into an age of computer animation and computer graphics where it is becoming hard to distinguish between the real and make believe. Today schools give our children laptops where then can Google the answer, instead of using their mind to search for the information and learn along the way. Using a calculator in Algebra class is common place, where before determination and methodology expanded horizons because we had to think about how we attained the answer. Try calling any major company without getting, "Press one if you want to do this, or press two if you want to do that," and you'll wear the numbers out on your telephone keypad just trying to get someone to listen to you. Our world today is in bits and bites, and our lives have somehow become stranded in the sequence of programming data and removed us from the basis of who we really are...people.
A resident has a problem or a guest has visited and given us an email as part of their contact information and what do we do, we take the easy way out. I'm waiting for the day when a guest card asks for their Twitter information and we will only communicate in a few words or letters and have to go to things like IYRWAACM. Ok, for those of you that didn't get that I said, "If you really want an apartment...call me." When did we stop dealing with people and forget the cell phone, email, twitter, and computer does not care or make decisions on where they choose to live?
I was visiting a community the other day and actually heard a leasing person say after a potential resident had just left, "I don't know why she would not give me her email. Now I have to call her!" I was visiting this community related to some market research I was doing, however, wanted to walk over to her and give her the V8 pop on the head. OMG, she's going to have to actually have follow-up communication with her which may not be the standard form email she was used to sending out, and maybe have to re-sell herself and her community.
Could it be we are not reinforcing the basic "people skill" essentials and therefore "dumbing down" our team members, which in turns hurts both our lease percentages and renewals? We are taking for granted basic communication elements which I believe our residents and prospects really want. Those elements include to be able to speak with a real live caring human being and not have to press a number that takes them to resident service hell, and to be listened to and not just communicated to. Ok, call me old fashioned! The same people who want all this instant stuff are the same ones today I hear complaining about not being able to talk to a real live caring human being. Maybe, just maybe, we need to go back to the premise that people should be put back into the equation. After all, try getting your smartphone to physically sign a lease or renewal. It still takes a person (Webster: 1. Human being, 2. Human body) to make the decision and pick up the pen. It's all about people!
A resident has a problem or a guest has visited and given us an email as part of their contact information and what do we do, we take the easy way out. I'm waiting for the day when a guest card asks for their Twitter information and we will only communicate in a few words or letters and have to go to things like IYRWAACM. Ok, for those of you that didn't get that I said, "If you really want an apartment...call me." When did we stop dealing with people and forget the cell phone, email, twitter, and computer does not care or make decisions on where they choose to live?
I was visiting a community the other day and actually heard a leasing person say after a potential resident had just left, "I don't know why she would not give me her email. Now I have to call her!" I was visiting this community related to some market research I was doing, however, wanted to walk over to her and give her the V8 pop on the head. OMG, she's going to have to actually have follow-up communication with her which may not be the standard form email she was used to sending out, and maybe have to re-sell herself and her community.
Could it be we are not reinforcing the basic "people skill" essentials and therefore "dumbing down" our team members, which in turns hurts both our lease percentages and renewals? We are taking for granted basic communication elements which I believe our residents and prospects really want. Those elements include to be able to speak with a real live caring human being and not have to press a number that takes them to resident service hell, and to be listened to and not just communicated to. Ok, call me old fashioned! The same people who want all this instant stuff are the same ones today I hear complaining about not being able to talk to a real live caring human being. Maybe, just maybe, we need to go back to the premise that people should be put back into the equation. After all, try getting your smartphone to physically sign a lease or renewal. It still takes a person (Webster: 1. Human being, 2. Human body) to make the decision and pick up the pen. It's all about people!
Thursday, July 28, 2011
Teaching the Teacher
I have been conducting CAM and CAPS classes for NAA for almost two decades (Lord that sounds old when I say that), and have been fortunate enough to be on the NAA Education Committee and serve as a subject matter expert on re-writing several of the modules with those designation programs. Today, was another day of teaching and learning which is the exciting part of what I do in addition to making new friends. It never amazes me that while I am there to lead students into an educational experience, I always have "take-away's," which I benefit from.
While facilitating the Risk Management course and leading the discussion, several great points were raised and we had some great questions. One of them dealt with private security at an apartment community and addressing crime problems they were attempting to overcome. This community which was a condo conversion to rentals, had been experiencing criminal activity as well as resident issues. Drastic steps were being taken to "re-position" the community, including hiring not just security (or patrols), but "armed" patrols. The owner of the site had handled the contract side of it, and the manager while being active in the action, brought up her part in working with them. Now if "armed security/patrols" scares anyone, there are many pitfalls and concerns that follow the path to the intended result. Our industry has been careful not to use or "imply" we provide security or can guarantee a safe and secure environment. The reason is we cannot guarantee security or safety, and no matter what we do things can happen beyond our control. Crime can happen anywhere including home, work, or simply picking up a gallon of milk at the grocery store. The question came up, "Does the badge worn by the patrol representatives which has security on it imply or provide a false sense of security?"
After contacting an attorney friend, the answer he gave was the usual attorney response "it could." Did not say it did, however, cautioned how it could be interpreted in a lawsuit or litigation should one be brought. The courts have gone both ways, however, mostly in favor of the resident or visitor at a property. As we all know insurance carriers are often trying to avoid court action and will settle if there is anything related to the case they are not comfortable with. He also asked what I brought up in the discussion, "Does your insurance carrier know this could be interpreted as implied based on their uniforms and armed status?" In this case he again was not direct, however, stated if he was representing an injured or victim in this case he would use it if he could.
Our jobs as professional property managers and as fiduciaries for owners is to bring these concerns to the forefront. The owner may wish to not investigate the challenge, however, you have done your job by bringing it up and documenting the communication. In this litigious and changing society, we are constantly hitting a mobile target and having to look at new risks and challenges. A good debate and discussion ensued related to this topic, and if nothing else opened everyone's eyes to what we face and what we need to be aware of in the decisions made by both us and by owners of our properties. This became a learning point for everyone, including this old codger who then had to investigate and obtain information making me understand more about what we do.
Good lesson for everyone.
While facilitating the Risk Management course and leading the discussion, several great points were raised and we had some great questions. One of them dealt with private security at an apartment community and addressing crime problems they were attempting to overcome. This community which was a condo conversion to rentals, had been experiencing criminal activity as well as resident issues. Drastic steps were being taken to "re-position" the community, including hiring not just security (or patrols), but "armed" patrols. The owner of the site had handled the contract side of it, and the manager while being active in the action, brought up her part in working with them. Now if "armed security/patrols" scares anyone, there are many pitfalls and concerns that follow the path to the intended result. Our industry has been careful not to use or "imply" we provide security or can guarantee a safe and secure environment. The reason is we cannot guarantee security or safety, and no matter what we do things can happen beyond our control. Crime can happen anywhere including home, work, or simply picking up a gallon of milk at the grocery store. The question came up, "Does the badge worn by the patrol representatives which has security on it imply or provide a false sense of security?"
After contacting an attorney friend, the answer he gave was the usual attorney response "it could." Did not say it did, however, cautioned how it could be interpreted in a lawsuit or litigation should one be brought. The courts have gone both ways, however, mostly in favor of the resident or visitor at a property. As we all know insurance carriers are often trying to avoid court action and will settle if there is anything related to the case they are not comfortable with. He also asked what I brought up in the discussion, "Does your insurance carrier know this could be interpreted as implied based on their uniforms and armed status?" In this case he again was not direct, however, stated if he was representing an injured or victim in this case he would use it if he could.
Our jobs as professional property managers and as fiduciaries for owners is to bring these concerns to the forefront. The owner may wish to not investigate the challenge, however, you have done your job by bringing it up and documenting the communication. In this litigious and changing society, we are constantly hitting a mobile target and having to look at new risks and challenges. A good debate and discussion ensued related to this topic, and if nothing else opened everyone's eyes to what we face and what we need to be aware of in the decisions made by both us and by owners of our properties. This became a learning point for everyone, including this old codger who then had to investigate and obtain information making me understand more about what we do.
Good lesson for everyone.
Monday, July 25, 2011
Expecting the Unexpected
First, I want to thank everyone for the great response I have received from the newly created workshop, "Expecting the Unexpected - Emergency Preparedness." It appears to be a huge success and important topic that is often overlooked unless you are taking a CAM or CAPS class. (or unless a hurricane is coming your way)
Emergency preparedness is not difficult to maintain, however, takes some work to establish a program that can be critical related to life, property, and financial implications. Every apartment community in this country faces threats which can have an impact on the community, its reputation, and its financial stability. Whether it be fire, flood, storm, ice or snow incident, earthquake, or other disaster, being prepared can lead to a recoverable condition and one you can make sound judgement decisions on both during and after the incident.
The workshop covers how to formulate a plan. Who is responsible for developing and understanding the plan? What disasters does your community face and how you can be pro-active and not just re-active? Who can communicate with the media and what should they communicate? How to respond in protecting the asset to minimize further damage or injury. How can you establish a communication channel to your team members, owners, and superiors in the light of an event? What should be included in your plan and emergency preparedness kit?
The recent fire at an apartment community I used to manage brought back memories of incidents my teams and I have had to be prepared for and respond to. Several fires, multiple floods, tornado's, hurricanes, snow and ice related storms, and the occasional police responded event which created a media headache are just a few. If you have ever had an entire building burn to the ground with everything owned and cherished by the valued residents being destroyed or ruined, you would understand the importance of this topic. We assume our managers and teams know how to deal with these issues, however, until it is experienced you will never understand. Problem is we also fail to provide training and direction, and often just "expect" the team to know what to do. If you think about it, a vast majority of our managers may have never had to deal with a disaster.
To expect the unexpected, we have to train and coach our teams so they are prepared. I know regional managers and vice presidents that have never dealt with a large or major disaster, simply fall apart when something happened because they were never coached or trained either. Trust me, this is not something you want to just learn on the job.
If you are interested in how this one day workshop can provide tools your teams will have use, please contact me. It takes much more than a few policy paragraphs or pages in Operating and Procedures Manual for your team members to be prepared and expect...the unexpected.
Emergency preparedness is not difficult to maintain, however, takes some work to establish a program that can be critical related to life, property, and financial implications. Every apartment community in this country faces threats which can have an impact on the community, its reputation, and its financial stability. Whether it be fire, flood, storm, ice or snow incident, earthquake, or other disaster, being prepared can lead to a recoverable condition and one you can make sound judgement decisions on both during and after the incident.
The workshop covers how to formulate a plan. Who is responsible for developing and understanding the plan? What disasters does your community face and how you can be pro-active and not just re-active? Who can communicate with the media and what should they communicate? How to respond in protecting the asset to minimize further damage or injury. How can you establish a communication channel to your team members, owners, and superiors in the light of an event? What should be included in your plan and emergency preparedness kit?
The recent fire at an apartment community I used to manage brought back memories of incidents my teams and I have had to be prepared for and respond to. Several fires, multiple floods, tornado's, hurricanes, snow and ice related storms, and the occasional police responded event which created a media headache are just a few. If you have ever had an entire building burn to the ground with everything owned and cherished by the valued residents being destroyed or ruined, you would understand the importance of this topic. We assume our managers and teams know how to deal with these issues, however, until it is experienced you will never understand. Problem is we also fail to provide training and direction, and often just "expect" the team to know what to do. If you think about it, a vast majority of our managers may have never had to deal with a disaster.
To expect the unexpected, we have to train and coach our teams so they are prepared. I know regional managers and vice presidents that have never dealt with a large or major disaster, simply fall apart when something happened because they were never coached or trained either. Trust me, this is not something you want to just learn on the job.
If you are interested in how this one day workshop can provide tools your teams will have use, please contact me. It takes much more than a few policy paragraphs or pages in Operating and Procedures Manual for your team members to be prepared and expect...the unexpected.
Tuesday, July 5, 2011
OMG...Budgets are coming!
July is about the time we start thinking of budgets for the next year. That process with some companies starts as early as August/September, which is right around the corner. Budgets are one of the most feared tasks within the duties and responsibilities as professional property managers.
The only thing we have to fear is fear itself… and budgets! Ok, so maybe FDR said it a little differently. As property managers we wear many hats with one of them being experts in budgeting, or so we are supposed to be. Sleepless nights and long hours with visions of numbers are spent, only to have our hard work changed or questioned. Of all the courses we take and are offered they tell us how to be leaders, how to write and understand financial reports, how to manage risks, how to market our communities, and a host of other areas. One gap in the management fence seems to be in providing the tools in not only how to write a budget, but how to sell one. There is an art to selling a budget and even though changes may be made, the challenge is to provide a budget you can be proud of with accuracy and detail that makes it less likely it will come back looking totally different than the one you submitted.
Through understanding budget principles, adding backup and details to substantiate your numbers, understanding goals before the process is started, and having a budgeting map, you will find the budget process far less intimidating and something not to fear. The goal is to assist you in preparing for the upcoming budget season and removing some of those fears. Some of the key aspects to budgeting are as follows:
- Budgeting should not be thought of as an event, it is a process. Teach your managers to set up a budget file for the next year, immediately after completing their budget for next period. As an example, if you have just completed your 2011 budget and it is now approved, set up file for the 2012 budget. This way during the year they can put in notes and information (including some of the things on their wish list removed from the budget just completed). This can include things they see throughout the year, photographs, news articles, changing maintenance issues, trend information, marketing data, etc. By the time the budget process is started, you already have a significant amount of information to use and provide as backup.
- Understanding why we budget can sometimes enlighten us as to how we need to budget. Tell them the why as well as the how. Give them goals, just don't tell them to prepare their budget. They cannot hit a target if we don't let them see it.
- What is a CBA and how can it assist in the sales process? Teach them what a Cost Benefit Analysis is and how it can be used to "sell" their budget and items within their budget. Remember upper management and owners are interested in one thing (mostly)....that is cash flow and NOI!
- What details and information make your budget more justifiable and less the opportunity for change? This includes photographs with notations and proposals, specifications that detail what is included in a proposed project, reliable market trend and data information, and what was given as goals and objectives and how they fit into the budget presented.
- How do photographs play a part in your presentation, and how to tie them to your budget? They say a thousand words and tell a story. If you are having roof issues, provide pictures that tell the story. Use Photoshop to place arrows on photos identifying areas of concern or safety identification markers. I have even had managers put together a Powerpoint presentation with their budget that was extremely effective in selling their budget.
- What is the best way to present a budget and what tricks can be the icing on your budget cake? The words we use and how detailed the budget is will be the difference between something being considered and something they will take our or disregard. An example of how effective wording can play a part is as follows:
- We have two roofs this year that have gone beyond the repair stage based on expert and comprehensive evaluation. The loss of income from four residents this year (which has occurred, based on feedback received) would more than pay for the required replacement. The attached photographs depict the severity of the issue, however, we would be more than happy to assist you on a personal visit to verify the information.
- Attached are photographs of our parking and drive areas, which as you know we deferred repair in the budget last year. Unfortunately, the deferred funds estimated at $58,000 if completed this year have increased for the coming year. Weather and use conditions as well as expansion of some of the temporary patched areas per your request have created a higher level of work, and do have an impact on the aesthetics and appearance of the community from both a prospect and resident perspective. The lowest estimate we have for inclusion in the coming year budget is $79,000.
- Three of our four direct and primary competitors completed forms of interior renovations in this last year. Photo's to substantiate this are included, as well as photo's depicting relevance of ABC Apartments. Reviewing objections from prospects who did not rent at ABC Apartments, the reason to lease at a competitor came down to upgraded conditions at the competitor were documented in over twenty prospects and has had a direct impact on reaching occupancy and income goals.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
